![]()
SPECIAL ETHICS LAW MEMO
![]()
SUBJECT: Lobbyist Contingent Fee Restrictions
This is a State Ethics Commission
staff informational memorandum. Although the State Ethics Commission is aware
of this document, it is not an opinion of the State Ethics Commission. This discussion is limited to contingent fee
issues and does not address other standards of conduct applicable to lobbyists.
The
State Ethics Law contains provisions prohibiting regulated lobbyists
from engaging in lobbying for contingent compensation, including fees or other
compensation arrangements. Because the
Law applies to regulated lobbyists (employers and individual regulated
lobbyists), this prohibition applies to the activities of both employers as to
their compensation approach and to individual regulated lobbyists’ receipt of
compensation.
Section
15-102(V)(l) defines legislative action as an official action or
non-action relating to:
§ a bill, resolution, amendment,
nomination, appointment, report or other matter within the jurisdiction of the
General Assembly, or
§ a bill presented
to the Governor for signature or veto.
Legislative
action
includes introduction, sponsorship, consideration, debate, amendment, passage,
defeat, approval or veto.
Section 15-102(L) defines executive action as an act for which the executive
branch of State government is responsible and that is taken by an official or
employee of that branch.
Section 15-713(1) provides that a regulated
lobbyist (including individual lobbyists and their employers) may not be
engaged for lobbying purposes for compensation that in any manner is
dependent on:
§
the enactment or defeat
of legislation;
§
any other contingency
related to legislative action;
§
the outcome of any executive
action relating to the solicitation or securing of a procurement contract;
or
§
any other contingency
related to executive action.
In
view of the restrictions established in the Ethics Law, lobbying compensation
generally will be a flat fee, established salary, hourly fee, or some
combination thereof. The statutory
prohibition against paying or receiving contingent fees is an important and
significant prohibition to protect against a lobbyist’s having incentives that
may suggest improper attempts to influence action.
Examples
of prohibited contingent fees include:
§
a fee structure dependent on whether
legislation is introduced, passed, defeated or amended. This also applies to two-tier fee
arrangements in which a retainer is paid and the fee increases based on some
legislative action or inaction.
§
a lobbying fee that is dependent on some
executive procurement decision or other executive administrative action or
inaction.
§
an arrangement by which a lobbyist will
receive an interest in a business entity depending on whether the legislation
lobbied allows the entity to be established or operate in a new manner.
§
an arrangement by which a lobbyist may
receive other types of non-lobbying employment or fees related to the success
of the lobbying effort . For example,
the State Ethics Commission advised in Opinion 88-13 that if a firm’s future
legal fees depended on success in lobbying a State contract, the fee was
considered to be a contingent.
Although the Ethics Law requires detailed records to support all
regulated lobbyist compensation and expenses, there is no express provision
that specifies what documentation is needed to establish the basis for the
compensation. In order to clearly
demonstrate compliance with the Law, we recommend that regulated lobbyist
obtain a written fee agreement prior to the start of lobbying activity. If such an agreement is not developed or is
developed after the lobbying process has begun, it will be difficult to
establish compliance with the Law or document that the fee was not
contingent. Contemporaneous
documentation of the fee structure is the most effective way to establish that
the fee was not contingent.
If
you have any questions about the compensation restrictions or other provisions
of the Ethics Law, we encourage you to contact the State Ethics Commission for
guidance.
11/1/05
![]()